Spotlight
Trending

Open Access vs Subscription: The All-Time Debate in Academia

Explore how open access and subscription journals differ in citations, readership, publication speed, APCs, promotion tactics, and impact factors. This data-driven analysis provides real numbers and context so researchers can understand the publishing landscape and make informed decisions about where to share their work.

Every researcher dreams of their work being read, shared, and cited. Yet, after months or years of research, even the most rigorous studies can remain virtually invisible. Choosing where and how to publish can have a major influence on the reach and impact of your work. Open access journals promise free global accessibility, while subscription journals leverage established readership and targeted promotion. Hybrid journals add a middle path, letting authors combine the strengths of both approaches.

The landscape of academic publishing is shaped by numbers: readership metrics, citations, article processing charges, publication speed, and promotional reach. Each metric can influence the ultimate visibility of a paper. This article examines these factors comprehensively, presenting data and analysis while allowing readers to draw their own conclusions.

Your article might be freely accessible but that doesn’t guarantee it will be discovered.

Open Access Journals: Free but Not Always Famous

Open access journals remove paywalls, making articles accessible to anyone with an internet connection. This has enormous implications for researchers in regions or institutions with limited subscriptions. OA articles are often mentioned as a medium for global knowledge dissemination, yet free access alone does not ensure visibility. Many OA journals rely heavily on indexing, search engines, and author-driven promotion rather than journal-led marketing campaigns.

Article Processing Charges, or APCs, are the main source of revenue for most OA journals. These fees can range from a few hundred dollars to several thousand, depending on the journal’s prestige and discipline. APCs cover peer review management, editorial work, and platform maintenance. Yet, the presence of APCs does not consistently correlate with higher citations. A study comparing multiple disciplines found that higher APCs increased visibility only modestly; the difference in citation counts was often influenced more by subject area and journal indexing than by cost alone.

Global expenditure on APCs has grown rapidly, reflecting the increasing adoption of open access. Between 2019 and 2023, six major publishers collectively spent approximately $8.35 billion on APCs, with $2.54 billion in 2023 alone. This illustrates both the scale of open access publishing and the financial investment authors or institutions often make to achieve immediate accessibility.

Free access opens doors, but exposure depends on how far your article is promoted.

Despite free access, OA articles frequently rely on author promotion to reach readership. Researchers often share their work on social media, academic platforms such as ResearchGate or Academia.edu, and institutional repositories. Conference presentations and emerging platforms like The Honores also provide additional opportunities to make work visible. In the absence of journal-led campaigns, these author-driven strategies become essential for ensuring readership and potential citations.

Subscription Journals: Established Reach

Subscription journals operate on a different note. By charging readers or institutions, they generate revenue that funds editorial quality, peer review, and extensive marketing campaigns. Journals like Nature and The Lancet boast loyal subscriber bases across the globe, often numbering in the tens of thousands. This built-in audience provides a ready-made readership for newly published research.

Beyond access, subscription journals often employ a variety of promotion tactics. Regular newsletters highlight newly published articles to targeted subscribers, social media channels circulate curated content, and press releases or editorials draw attention to selected papers. These strategies increase the likelihood that research will be read and cited. Even niche research benefits from this reach, simply by appearing in curated content feeds that go directly to active researchers.

Subscription journals combine legacy readership and promotion, which can amplify an article’s reach and citations.

From a financial perspective, subscription revenue allows journals to maintain quality operations and invest in long-term promotional strategies. The consistent funding stream often makes subscription journals attractive for authors seeking established visibility, particularly in highly competitive or niche fields.

Citations and Metrics: Numbers That Speak

Citation counts are often the first metric researchers consider when choosing where to publish. While subscription journals have historically shown higher average citation rates, analysis controlling for journal age, discipline, and location shows the differences often shrink or disappear.

Hybrid journals provide a unique perspective. By allowing individual articles to be made open access within a subscription journal, hybrid models allow researchers to observe citation differences between OA and paywalled articles in the same environment. Studies indicate that hybrid OA articles may gain 17.8 more citations on average compared to closed-access counterparts. This demonstrates that access alone can influence citation metrics, but the effect depends on multiple contextual factors including journal promotion and indexing.

Even within OA-only journals, citation patterns vary widely by discipline. In a study focused on pesticide research, subscription articles amassed 37,674 citations while OA articles accounted for 20,904 citations. The data suggests that although OA broadens accessibility, subscription journals often maintain a stronger built-in citation ecosystem due to established readership.

High-quality research can reach millions for free — yet it may still remain unread without strategic promotion.

Promotion Tactics: Journals vs Authors

Promotion is a crucial determinant of readership and citations. Journals often leverage structured campaigns, including newsletters, featured collections, and social media outreach. Subscription journals, funded by revenue from readers or institutions, can maintain consistent and high-quality promotion over time. OA journals typically have limited marketing budgets, placing more responsibility on authors to promote their work individually.

Author-driven promotion has evolved dramatically. Researchers now use academic networking sites, social media platforms, and institutional repositories to boost visibility. Some even write lay summaries or blog posts to reach a broader audience. The combination of journal and author efforts often determines how widely research is read and cited, regardless of access model.

Author-driven Promotion drives readership — whether your journal charges or not.

Time to publication also intersects with promotion. OA journals often employ continuous publication models, which make articles available online as soon as they pass peer review. Subscription journals sometimes use issue-based publication cycles, potentially delaying visibility despite the journal’s established readership. Hybrid journals generally mirror the parent subscription journal’s editorial schedule.

Hybrid Journals: The Middle Path

Hybrid journals represent a unique intersection of subscription and open access. They allow authors to make individual articles open access within a subscription journal, often through the payment of an APC. This approach combines aspects of subscription-based promotion and OA accessibility.

Data from hybrid journals suggests that OA articles within these journals can experience higher downloads and citation rates than closed-access articles in the same journal. The choice of hybrid OA can thus be influenced by both visibility and funder mandates. Despite this, hybrid OA uptake remains uneven across disciplines and journals.

Articles published OA in hybrid journals can receive significantly more downloads than closed access papers — even in high-impact titles.

Financial Perspective: Where the Money Goes

Revenue models shape the way research reaches readers. Subscription journals reinvest income into editorial quality, peer review, and promotion. OA journals rely on APCs, which make the article immediately accessible but do not always fund ongoing marketing. Hybrid journals combine these models, with APCs supplementing subscription revenue.

Revenue models shape promotion — what funds a journal determines how your research reaches readers.

Enhancing Reach Through TheHonores.com

Publishing alone is not enough. The Honores.com helps amplify research visibility by providing SEO optimization, curated promotion to relevant academic and professional audiences, and strategies to increase citations and engagement. Whether your article is OA or subscription-based, TheHonores.com ensures it reaches the readers who matter.

FAQs on Open Access vs. Subscription journals debate

Q: Do Open Access Journals Really Get More Citations?
A: Many studies suggest that open access articles may reach wider audiences, but citation impact varies by discipline, journal, and promotion efforts. Hybrid studies show OA articles in subscription journals can gain 17–18 more citations on average.

Q: Can Subscription Journals Restrict Your Research Reach?
A: Subscription journals rely on paywalls, limiting access to those with institutional subscriptions. However, their built-in readership and promotional campaigns often ensure visibility among active researchers.

Q: Are Open Access Articles Truly More Discoverable Online?
A: Yes, because OA articles are indexed in repositories and searchable on search engines. But discoverability still depends on promotion, metadata, and author outreach strategies.

Q: How Much Do Article Processing Charges (APCs) Affect Your Publication Choice?
A: APCs can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars, depending on journal prestige. While they ensure free access, they don’t automatically guarantee higher citations or visibility.

Q: Should Early-Career Researchers Prefer Open Access or Subscription Journals?
A: It depends on goals: OA increases accessibility, while subscription journals offer established readership. Promotion, journal impact factor, and discipline-specific trends often guide the decision.

Q: How Do Hybrid Journals Change the Open Access vs Subscription Debate?
A: Hybrid journals allow individual articles to be open access in subscription journals. Data shows hybrid OA articles can gain higher downloads and citations while leveraging the journal’s existing audience.

Q: Does Faster Publication Time Always Mean More Visibility?
A: Not necessarily. OA journals often use continuous publication models for speed, but visibility also depends on promotion, indexing, and readership engagement.

Q: Can Author-Led Promotion Beat Journal Marketing?
A: Authors sharing their research through social media, repositories, or blogs can significantly increase visibility, sometimes outperforming journals with limited marketing resources.

Q: How Do Impact Factors Influence Open Access vs Subscription Decisions?
A: High-impact subscription journals may offer more built-in visibility, while some OA journals with lower impact factors rely heavily on discoverability and author promotion to gain citations.

Q: Do Funders’ Open Access Mandates Affect Journal Choice?
A: Yes, many funders require or encourage OA publication. This influences hybrid or full OA options, particularly for authors seeking compliance with funding policies.

Q: Is Free Access Enough to Guarantee Research Readership?
A: Free access helps, but without promotion, indexing, and strategic outreach, even OA articles can remain largely unread. Visibility requires both accessibility and active dissemination.

Q: How Can TheHonores.com Help Increase Readership and Citations?
A: TheHonores.com amplifies research impact by optimizing SEO, sharing articles with targeted academic audiences, and using newsletters and social promotion to enhance discoverability and citations, regardless of journal type.

Sources

  1. Björk, BC., Solomon, D. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Med 10, 73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-73.
  2. Clark AD, Myers TC, Steury TD, Krzton A, Yanes J, Barber A, et al. Does it pay to pay? A comparison of the benefits of open-access publishing across various sub-fields in biology. PeerJ. 2024 Feb 27;12:e16824. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16824. PMID: 38436005; PMCID: PMC10906259.
  3. Saravudecha C, Na Thungfai D, Phasom C, Gunta-in S, Metha A, Punyaphet P, et al. Hybrid Gold Open Access Citation Advantage in Clinical Medicine: Analysis of Hybrid Journals in the Web of Science. Publications. 2023; 11(2):21. doi: 10.3390/publications11020021.
  4. Murugappan S, Ramalingam J. How Do Open and Closed Access Journals Compare in Citations, Altmetrics, and Social Media Engagement for Pesticide Research? Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice [Internet]. 2025 Mar 30;13(1):70–84. doi: 10.1633/JISTAP.2025.13.1.5.
  5. Haustein S, Schares E, Alperin JP, Hare M, Butler LA, Schönfelder N. Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16551. 2024 Jul 23.
  6. Wiley Author Services. Make your article open access in hybrid journals.
  7. Schönfelder N. Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model? Quantitative Science Studies. 2020 Feb 1;1(1):6-27.
  8. Asai S. Determinants of article processing charges for hybrid and gold open access journals. Information Discovery and Delivery. 2023 Apr 7;51(2):121-9.
  9. Tetzner R. How Open Access Expands Research Readership and Academic Reach. Oproof-reading-service.com. 2025 Mar 03.
  10. Jahn N. How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements?. Quantitative Science Studies. 2025 Mar 12;6:242-62.
  11. Jahn N, Matthias L, Laakso M. Toward transparency of hybrid open access through publisher‐provided metadata: An article‐level study of Elsevier. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2022 Jan;73(1):104-18.

Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute professional advice and should not replace consultation with institutional advisors or ethics boards. Some content on this page may have been created or reviewed with the help of artificial intelligence tools. While every effort is made to ensure reliability, readers are advised to consult primary sources. External links and references are offered for convenience, and Honores is not liable for their content or impact.

Show More
Back to top button